I’ve been at Internet world for the last two days and if I’m honest, I have been a little disappointed. I know the majority of it is free and as such you have to endure the chalk strip suited sales monkeys and semi naked models pimping their wares but for me the balance was all wrong.
Earlier in the year I attended FOWA 2007 and the two events are like chalk an cheese, true neither had wireless but really that was the only similarity. FOWA had interesting and insightful speakers, talking from personal experience (yes there were a few sales pitches but they were kept short and didn’t pretend to be anything else).
Where as Internet world, has thus far been vague and I can’t help feeling that many of the speakers were more interested in trying to win new business than engaging in the debate. Web 2.0 as you might expect was the buzz of the event yet the majority of speakers seemed unaware that social software has much greater implications for their business models than it does for software architecture.
One guy who stood out like a sore thumb was Loic he was sharing his personal experience of a very different business model.
1) build a good product that services a genuine need
2) open it up to the public
3) invite criticism/ideas
4) take criticism/ideas on board build a better product/relationship with people
5) cycle on a daily, weekly or monthly basis
traditional business model
1) build a product we think is good (behind close doors)
2) heavily promote and advertise it (because we know its shit but we have spent too much on building and we need ROI)
3) Employ a PR firm to bury any negative feedback
I don’t think the suits were listening.


